Iron Mike Golf said:
A question about the test's validity:
How does the use of a Ransom Rest affect the number of firings needed to cause measurable crimp jump?
I don't own a Ransom, but simple physics will give you the answer.
It has been reported that lighter guns experience crimp jump worst than heavier guns. That is because the lighter the gun, the more it recoils back from the forces exerted by the round being fired. The other cartridges' cases get pulled back by the recoil while the slugs (by their inertia) want to remain stationary. Let me repeat: The cases pull back from the stationary slugs.
Now, clamp the gun in a Ransom Rest, bolt the rest to the shooting bench and lock all movement of the gun.
It should be obvious. The gun, the cylinder, the unfired cases in the cylinder do not get pulled back by recoil. Less tendency (down to near zero) to jump crimp. Suspend the gun in a cradle that can swing free and you will maximize the tendency to jump crimp (for that gun and ammunition).
On another note. I have experienced crimp jump in my SP101 firing moderate loads, 158 grain bullets and light crimp (very light). I have even tied up the gun a couple of times. But I have also been able to push the bullets back in the case/cylinder with my finger. I have no idea if a heavily crimped slug (that jumped crimp) could be pushed back into the case by finger pressure, but if faced with a bear and a tied-up revolver, I would certainly try.
Lost Sheep