GasGuzzler
Hunter
If I ever even consider buying or loading a 125 grain .357 round, please step in as I need help.
You never know until you try. Your gun may really like them. Unless you are shooting deer or bears you shouldn't need more and the extra velocity can really make a bullet "perform". Not to mention the reduced recoil along with all that performance. Remember in the Energy equation velocity is squared.If I ever even consider buying or loading a 125 grain .357 round, please step in as I need help.
A 357 could probably push those 1,800fps. Who knows if the barrel could stabilize them. That's my next experiment for the Dan Wesson. Light bullets going really fast.Then I would use something else appropriately loaded.
Of course there isn't. You can push the same bullets way faster!!! I bet you could get 68gr Lehigh's up to 2,000fps easy!!!My point is there is no reason to load a .357 to shoot like 9X19. I'll just shoot that instead.
5.7 grains of AA #7What is the powder charge and type,if you don't mind..
Thank you Kevin.@LAH those are some nice looking bullets!
Not to be critical, but the Lee flat nose bullet looks like something one would use in a lever gun. I've gone to the Saeco style nose in semi's for feed reliability,and in my moon clip guns for smooth reloads.Kevin you asked is one 9mm bullet weight more accurate than another? I can't answer that for you. I will say the Saeco 928 bullet shot very well in my three 9s. As for the bullet I use, I have switched all my 9s to the Lee 38-125-RF. It works great plus I use it a lot in my 38 Specials.
Saeco 928
Lee 38-125-RF![]()
![]()
"Accuracy first " Yep.extex,, welcome to the forum & this discussion.
I consider all guns as a machine. I want the machine to perform at it's best. So, I handload. And I work on loads that perform the 2 main functions. Accuracy,, because it has to hit the target, and do the intended job. If paper punching,, then accuracy is THE main thing I consider. If I need the bullet to stop a bear,, then it must also perform in a test medium that gives me confidence in what happens AFTER it hits the target.
If I were to use factory ammo, I'd use the same criteria. But it'd be a lot more expensive for me to test & find what's best.
In handloading,, once I find a good load in one gun, I will often test it in other guns. Often,, it will be just fine in several guns,, while other times,, it may be a load that no other gun accepts in a fashion I need.
Accuracy first, followed by terminal performance.
Sam mentioned when he had .9mm bullets to sell, the most popular was the 115 grn for competitors. He's right. BUT,, as more & more folks got to using the .9mm in competition,, many found they preferred heavier bullets, and currently,, most are shooting a 147 grn bullet. I found a sweet spot in using a 124 grn bullet,, that 2 of my competition guns enjoy. They shoot very accurately,, and they are dependable. Since they are either punching paper or banging steel,, they are performing as I need them to.
I prefer to test the accuracy of my handguns at a STARTING distance of 25 yds. If it can't perform at that distance,, I try other stuff. Why 25 yds? Well, at that distance,, a bullet has had time to stabilize it's flight pattern in general. And while much of my USPSA competition is at distances less than that,, it's just fine. BUT,, I also test stuff to 50 yds for competition because occasionally at bigger matches,, you'll be presented with shots out to 50 yds. Several years ago,, at an Area 6 Level 3 Regional match,, there was a stage that had harder targets at distances out to 40 yds. Over 1/3 of the total competitors had a ZERO score on that stage due to misses. It was the main stage that most talked about being so hard. While my performance there wasn't "my best" it also wasn't my worst. I had several things that I had to change at the last moment prior to the match. I'd planned to shoot revolver category,, yet was told there were only (2) of us signed up for revolver. So, I switched categories,, to Limited 10,, and used my 1911 in .45 acp. I hadn't shot that gun in a match in over 2 years. BUT,, my load had been developed for accuracy, and I knew it was good to those distances. I won my division for Area 6.
My point is,, try different ammo to find how it performs in YOUR machine, (gun) and then you will be much happier.
Critical is good. I wondered if it would feed without issue myself. Both my S&W MPs & the CZ75 feed it without issue. I wanted something with a meplat for varmints & coyote/bobcat when a shot was presented. There is also no shoulder on the Lee bullet so they work pretty good in speedloads/strips. You are correct, they have the profile of what works in the levergun.Not to be critical, but the Lee flat nose bullet looks like something one would use in a lever gun. I've gone to the Saeco style nose in semi's for feed reliability,and in my moon clip guns for smooth reloads.